March 2017 - Help STOP Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH)

Home » Month: March 2017

The Most Dangerous Addiction of Them All: Entitlements

No$ Grant Recipient Relationship Addiction

“Entitlement Community” is HUD’s official name for counties, cities, towns, and municipalities that take grants. “):” The Patriot Post: The Most Dangerous Addiction of Them All: Entitlements The Left in every country should literally be regarded as a drug dealer. Dennis Prager · Mar. 26, 2017 All addictions — whether to drugs, alcohol, gambling, sex Continue Reading

Smith Young March 28, 2017 AFFH with Strings Attached Charity, Entitlement 1,411 Comments

How HUD Makes Zoning Changes Through the Back Door

Introduction by Smith Young “):” This article is mistaken and malformed throughout, but it’s an excellent piece of literature on how an important topic can be massaged to present a convincingly false narrative. Using evidence associated with this complex topic with many vested interests, the information below demonstrates how staff writers push an agenda, how Continue Reading

Smith Young March 15, 2017 Knowledgeable About AFFH county, impediments, rockford, zoning 704 Comments

Statement on Ben Carson Confirmation as HUD Secretary

AFFH, worse thing since slavery, Ben Carson

by Vann Ellison For release: 03.02.17 Contact: jim@vannellison.org or 301.704.1363 The following statement is from Vann Ellison who runs regional homeless shelter, feeding ministry and drug rehab programs. “For eight years the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development has strayed badly from it mission. When it does focus on homelessness and poverty it has Continue Reading

Smith Young March 2, 2017 Just News ben carson, confirmation 9,902 Comments

Elevator Speech

AFFH gives FREE federal grant money to the suburbs. But what they don't tell you is that by taking the money, you the suburbs will be forced to gentrify your neighborhoods with low-income racially diverse high density housing.

1) HUD is imposing requirements that go far beyond what the 1968 Fair Housing Act demands
2) Moves high density low income (rental) housing to the suburbs
3) The new rule restricts private choice, local government authority, and the evolutionary history of American residential growth patterns
4) Uses subsidies (block grants) as blackmail against 1,194 targeted U.S. localities
5) HUD grantees must consider statistical data such as education and transportation that are only remotely related to housing
6) Communities threatened with huge legal expenses from allegations by HUD and Civil Rights groups
7) HUD requires racial analysis of demographic data that should instead be colorblind (race baiting?)

Editors Note

The AFFH rule does not do anything for or against discrimination, it merely revamps the planning process of localities applying for grant monies, replacing Analysis with Assessment using the new Tool.
The AFFH rule neither replaces nor extends the 1968 Fair Housing Act
1) We are against discrimination and we do support the 1968 Fair Housing Act
2) We oppose the AFFH rule and it's anti-American implementation of the Supreme Courts decision on "disparate Impact"